Monday, 25 February 2013

A response to Moody’s downgraded UK Government bond rating

As many will already know, Moody's ‘downgraded the domestic- and foreign-currency Government bond ratings of the United Kingdom by one notch to Aa1 from Aaa.’ on February 22nd 2013. You will have seen much press comment on this issue and its potential consequences.

The purpose of this blog is to consider this issue further. The reality is that there is very little intrinsic value in this news; both the downgrade and the reasons for the downgrade were widely anticipated. It should be noted that the judgements of the ratings agencies have only a limited influence on the relative attractiveness of G7 Government bonds.

The UK’s new, lower credit rating

The UK has enjoyed the highest possible credit rating from Moody’s since March 1978. A little over a year ago, on 13 February 2012, Moody’s warned of a potential downgrade when it altered the outlook from ‘stable’ to ‘negative’.

We are not alone, and now, Britain joins France and the US, leaving just Canada and Germany among the G7 with an Aaa rating.

An Aa1 credit rating is the second notch in a rung of 21 possible ratings (see table 1), which are detailed below for reference and consideration:

Table 1. Moody’s Investor Services
RatingDescription
Aaa The highest quality and lowest credit risk
Aa1, Aa2, Aa3 Rated as high quality and very low credit risk
A1, A2, A3 Rated as upper-medium grade and low credit risk
Baa1, Baa2, Baa3 Rated as medium grade, with some speculative elements and moderate credit risk
Ba1, Ba2, Ba3 Judged to have speculative elements and a significant credit risk
B1, B2, B3 Judged as being speculative and a high credit risk
Caa1, Caa2, Caa3 Rated as poor quality and very high credit risk
Ca Highly speculative, near or in default, some possibility of recovering principal and interest
C Lowest quality, usually in default, low likelihood of recovering principal and interest

Moody’s justifies the UK’s standing at this high rating as follows:

‘...the UK's creditworthiness remains extremely high, rated at Aa1, because of the country's significant credit strengths. These include (i) a highly competitive, well-diversified economy; (ii) a strong track record of fiscal consolidation and a robust institutional structure; and (iii) a favourable debt structure, with supportive domestic demand for Government debt, the longest average maturity structure (15 years) among all highly rated sovereigns globally and the resulting reduced interest rate risk on UK debt.’

In applying a ‘stable outlook’, Moody’s are not anticipating any change to the current rating in the next 12 to 18 months.

‘The stable outlook on the UK's Aa1 sovereign rating reflects Moody's expectation that a combination of political will and medium-term fundamental underlying economic strengths will, in time, allow the Government to implement its fiscal consolidation plan and reverse the UK's debt trajectory. Moreover, although the UK's economy has considerable risk exposure through trade and financial linkages to a potential escalation in the euro area sovereign debt crisis, its contagion risk is mitigated by the flexibility afforded by the UK's independent monetary policy framework and sterling's global reserve currency status.’

You might wonder then, why it is that Moody’s has downgraded UK Government debt...

Reasons for the downgrade

To consider this further, Moody’s suggest that there are three interrelated ‘drivers’ for its actions.

1. The continuing weakness in the UK's medium-term growth outlook, with a period of sluggish growth which Moody's now expects will extend into the second half of the decade;

2. The challenges that subdued medium-term growth prospects pose to the Government's fiscal consolidation programme, which will now extend well into the next parliament;

3. And, as a consequence of the UK's high and rising debt burden, deterioration in the shock-absorption capacity of the Government's balance sheet, which is unlikely to reverse before 2016.’

In short, the UK appears to be stuck in a protracted and unusually slow period of recovery. This has suppressed tax receipts; just as it inflates Government spending and all the while it remains in recovery it also remains highly vulnerable to any kind of external shock.

What could the impact be?

It is not possible to say with any certainty what the impact of this downgrade will be, but... as I wrote in my opening remarks there is very little news contained in Moody’s announcement. It was increasingly odd that the UK maintained the very highest rating when the US, which has made far greater progress toward a sustainable recovery, lost its Standard & Poor’s AAA rating 18 months ago.

There is some sympathy for Martin Wolf’s view, expressed in his Financial Times column on 23 February, which says:

‘The judgment of the ratings agencies adds next to nothing to understanding of the economic condition of such a well-known issuer... Armies of official and private economists understand the underlying data and closely follow developments. In this crowd of commentators, the rating agencies are just another voice... At most, Moody’s has reminded the world of what it knows... Partly for this reason, the downgrade is unlikely to damage the UK gilt market.’

The yield on the 10-year gilt was 32 basis points (0.32%) more than the equivalent German bond this time last year when Moody’s applied a ‘negative’ outlook for the UK. That ‘spread’ subsequently fell to 13 basis points in August last year, in defiance of Moody’s judgement, before rising steadily to a current spread of 55 basis points. I’ll leave it to you to decide if Moody’s are responding to the market’s judgement or if the markets are responding to Moody’s judgement.

Summary
Gilt yields have risen, of late, in lock-step with equity markets just as German, Japanese and US Government bond yields have. This will remain the dominant factor affecting gilt yields.

Moody’s downgrade follows a growing perception that the outlook for Britain’s fiscal position has not progressed. Underlying this are serious challenges for policymakers in the UK. Thus far, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has pressed ahead with austerity measures that have, by now, proven unwise in voracity at the same time as placing too much faith in the ability of the Governor of the Bank of England to support the economy single-handedly. A fall in sterling’s trade-weighted exchange rate is already underway. Perhaps the downgrade from Moody’s will add just a little impetus to sterling’s decline.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. Fund values can fall as well as rise and are not guaranteed.

At Chapters Financial, we have been planning client’s investment planning for many years, offering high quality independent financial advice. Because each consumer is different, as is their financial planning needs, no individual advice has been provided in this Blog.

Keith G Churchouse,
Chartered Financial Planner, Director,
Chapters Financial Limited Chapters Financial Limited is Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Number 402899

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

Long Term Care, Care Costs and Inheritance Tax

I am not sure I have ever seen two high-profile financial planning issues linked so closely by Government before, namely that of Inheritance Tax and care costs for Long Term Care. The recently commissioned Dilnot Report has done much to correctly move the issue of care costs forward.

Both topics are emotive subjects for both families and those in their older ages. They will generate much text over the next few months. The new plans (subject to confirmation and detail) is to cap long term care costs at £75,000 with assessment for this cap starting at a new level of £123,000. With care costs for many running at around £1,000 per week, as an example, you can soon work out that with £52,000 per annum being spent on care costs, it is easy for estate values to fall quickly. Ironically, this has the 'advantage' of reducing future Inheritance Tax liabilities.

The 'generosity' of this change offered by the Government will not be without expense. We are all aware that they have no money and this change will need to be afforded. This is planned to be achieved by freezing Inheritance Tax (IHT) levels until 2019. In George Osborn's Autumn Statement at the end of 2012, the current Inheritance Tax nil rate band allowance for an individual of £325,000 was going to increase to £329,000 from tax year start 2015/2016. This plan has now clearly changed to accommodate this new planning.

The devil may well be in the detail and I am sure there may be a few more changes before these (apparently) now linked allowances are finalised.

No individual advice has been provided during the course of this blog. Both Long Term Care and Inheritance Tax should be planned for carefully and if you would like to receive individual advice for your circumstances, then please contact the team at Chapters Financial Limited on 01483 578800

Keith Churchouse, FPFS
Director, Chapters Financial Limited, Guildford, Surrey


Chapters Financial Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority, number 402899.

Friday, 1 February 2013

Sick Pay Cover – Do you have enough?

I recently completed a financial plan for a director of a successful local company. Amongst the usual planning for pensions and life cover, I also wanted to address a much overlooked (and vital) area, which is the protection of income in the event of inability to work due to ill health. In this case, the topic was especially relevant because the business was young and very much reliant on its director to drive sales. He was clearly good at this because of the trajectory of profits achieved so far.

With no cover elsewhere, other than capital achieved from sales within the company which would deplete quickly without its sales 'driver', this was an area of exposure that once identified, the director wanted to address promptly.

Far too few people consider the impacts on their household finances in the event of them being unable to work due to ill health. Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) only pays for a maximum of 28 weeks at a level of £85.85 gross per week (2012/13) paid by the employer with income tax and National Insurance to be deducted.

In this blog, I wanted to look at the factors that can affect the final monthly premiums offered on Income Protection Policies, all of which are subject to medical underwriting.

The obvious factors are existing health condition, age and if the applicant is a smoker (which would see premiums lift significantly).

The other main factors which now influence premium levels are as follows:

G-Day
The recent EU ruling on the equalisation of rates between men and women has seen the most dramatic increases on male applicants for income protection policies. In some cases the increase has been as high as 40-50% increase for a male applicant in comparison to pre-G-Day (Gender Equalisation day of 21st December 2012), although a more typical increase could be around 25-30%. Conversely, female applicants should see a reduction of their premium in comparison to their premiums pre-G-Day, although I don’t believe it will be as large a discount as the increases seen for males.

End date / Term
As noted above, the maximum term which SSP pays is 28 weeks, however most Income Protection Plans, also known as Permanent Health Insurance (PHI) policies, can be set with a cover period up until the applicants 65th Birthday, possibly even longer depending upon the insurer. Obviously the longer the cover period (especially with the policy term into the advanced age range of 55 to 65) will increase the premium accordingly, however this longer period can be invaluable when planning your protection needs because it allows for some income provision beyond the Statutory Sick Pay (or even an employers’ own sick pay arrangements).

Inflation uplift / Escalation
At the outset of the insurance policy you can select whether the cover amount will stay level (cheaper premiums) or escalate / increase (usually in line with inflation as an example). Escalation will increase the monthly premium, but if the policy is to be in force for many years (for example a 30 year term) then at the point of claim the escalation of benefit could prove very worthwhile if the claim is towards the end of the policy term.

Waiting Period
This is sometimes referred to as a deferral period and is the length of time the claimant has to be unable to work due to ill health before a claim will be paid. The longer you set the deferral period the cheaper the premiums will be, however planning should be taken to ensure that sufficient other funds / income are available to provide for loss of income during the selected waiting period. Examples of waiting periods might be 4, 8, 13, 26 or even 52 weeks.

Calculation of amount of cover (maximum)
One of the key drivers for insurance premium costs is obviously how much cover is required and, therefore, the amount the insurer will have to pay in the event of a claim. In my opinion, the key minimum cover should be the amount the individual pays towards household costs on a monthly basis. However, in most cases this is not the ideal and careful consideration should be taken in planning the appropriate level of cover.

Dividend v Salary
This is a very important issue, especially considering my example case mentioned above. This is because many business owners / directors pay themselves nominal salary and higher dividend amounts for tax, and potentially cash-flow, purposes. Many insurers may not include the dividends in their calculation of a claimants income, so the desired amount of cover may not be available, or even paid, in the event of a claim. Some insurers may apply an increase in premium to reflect that they will include dividends. Careful attention of the terms and conditions of the income calculation allowed must be considered before starting the policy.

Guaranteed / Reviewable Premiums
The final major point which could affect the premium illustrated is whether the premiums are guaranteed (i.e. they will not change, apart from escalation if chosen, during the term of the policy) or reviewable. Reviewable premiums allow the insurer to calculate premiums collected against claims amounts paid and if they believe that there is a discrepancy then they can amend the premiums accordingly. This review tends not to be done on an individual basis but rather on a demographic basis for the insurers “risk book”. Guaranteed premiums tend to be slightly more costly at outset, but at least you know what you will be paying during the term of the policy.

Individual or Employer pays the premium
Generally speaking, insurers have an understanding that all income protection policies which an individual can hold will pay a combined maximum of 50% of a claimants gross annual earned income. This will normally be paid on a tax-free basis if the individual pays the premium. If the premium is to be paid for by the employer, then the maximum available is usually 65-75% of the claimants gross income paid on a taxable basis.

As you would expect, each element noted above is likely to have an effect on the final premium offered. Being independent financial advisers (IFA's) we have the ability to use the whole market to search out competitive providers in most circumstances.

No individual advice has been provided during the course of this blog. Protection in the event of either death or ill health should be planned for carefully and if you would like to receive individual advice on this subject, then please contact the team at Chapters Financial Limited on 01483 578800

Simon Hewitt BSc (Hons) Dip PFS
Financial Planner
Chapters Financial Limited 
Chapters Financial Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority, number 402899.

Monday, 14 January 2013

The State Pension......and the possible changes ahead?

This week we have seen our coalition Government turn their attention to the State Pension and the way the current benefits are provided. I am sure there will much press coverage, comment and concern about future changes, both for those who may be effected in the shorter term, from 2017, and for those who hope to claim this benefit into the longer term.

I wanted to provide a summary, and for the purposes of this Blog, I have divided this into the following sections:

The Past and Present

Currently, the basic State Pension amounts to £107.45 per week. This income is paid gross, but is taxable and increases with the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) with a minimum guarantee of 2.5% if CPI falls below this rate, which it did in 2012. On top of this, you might also receive additional State Pension income from past accrual of the State Earnings Related Pension (sometimes known as SERPS) or its successor, the Second State Pension (S2P). I have seen this additional pension benefit when added see the overall pension paid double on regular occasions.

My current understanding is that those who have State Pension benefit in payment before 2017 will not be affected by the possible proposals.

You can probably tell that this can be a complicated calculation when taking into account all the varying factors, with a maximum accrual achieved over 30 years (proposed to increase to 35 years). Here lies part of the perceived problem and the target to simplify the process. It is also proposed that no State Pension will be achieved, with a proposed minimum of 10 years National Insurance accrual to qualify for any State Pension.

How do I check my current State Pension benefit?

You can check your current accrual of your State Pension by completing a BR19 State Pension Forecast Form (available here).

State Pension Deferral

It is currently possible to defer the State Pension after your normal State Pension age (which we know as been increasing over recent times and still increasing), seeing the benefit deferred increasing by 1.0% for every 5 week period. This increase amounts to 10.4% over a full year and this option can be beneficial in financial planning for those who, as an example, continue to work and have no immediate need for the income.

For information, this increase can be taken as taxable cash or increased taxable income. It will be interesting to see if this option survives the final ruling on future changes.

The Future?

The new proposals put forward for 2017 suggests a flat rate of State Pension of around £155.00 per week in total (about £144.00 per week in today’s terms). Of course, this figure may change when everything is finalised. Past SERPS and S2P accrual (which might have given a higher income if the rules had not changed) will be gone.

Of course and as usual, there are winners and losers by changes in legislation. Winners are likely to lower earners and some have indicated females who opted out of the State Pension many years ago. Losers are likely to be higher earners or medium earners who did not contract-out of SERP's (option started in 1988 and stopped around 2 years ago).

Summary

It is suggested that the other 'winner' in these proposals will be the Government, with an overall reduction in long term costs. We are all living longer and, understandably, this places greater burden on the pension system, whether that be the State system or private sector schemes. Clearly, planning for your future retirement will become ever more important to secure future benefits.

No individual advice has been provided during the course of this blog. Pension and retirement planning should be planned for carefully and if you would like to receive individual advice on this subject, then please contact the team at Chapters Financial Limited on 01483 578800

Keith G Churchouse FPFS
Director, ISO22222 Certified Financial Planner
Chapters Financial Limited, Guildford, Surrey
Chapters Financial Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority, number 402899.

Wednesday, 2 January 2013

Economic Data & Views for 2013 and beyond


Some of our clients will know that to maintain our high standards and independence, we consult with a specialist investment company, Cormorant Capital Strategies Limited, to ensure that our investment recommendations remain current and robust.
Cormorant Capital Strategies has collated the following thoughts using recently published data, giving views on various economic issues. Please note that future predictions are, as suggested, only predictions and cannot be relied on for the future. These indicators can and will change. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance.
A review of the latest OBR Economic and Fiscal Outlook
The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) published its latest Economic and Fiscal Outlook on 5th December.
1. Gross Domestic Product
Not surprisingly, given its forecast in March for economic growth in 2012 at a rate of 0.8%, the OBR has had to concede that the ‘economy has performed less strongly... than we expected’. A similar concession would be required from the median of independent forecasts too; back in March the consensus outside forecast was 0.5%. Barring surprising strength in the fourth quarter, it seems likely that output in 2012 will be flat or negative. The OBR’s updated 2012 forecast is for a fall of 0.1% year-on-year.
Its central forecast for 2013 calls for 1.2% growth (not dissimilar to the median of independent forecasts of 1.1%) and for 2.0% the following year rising, optimistically, to 2.8% in 2017. The OBR’s range of estimates suggests that there is a 1-in-5 chance that the economy will shrink during 2013.
 
   
Output remains 3.0 % lower than during its prior peak in the first quarter of 2008.
2. Inflation

Consumer Price Index inflation is expected to fall in the next few years from the current rate of 2.7% (November) toward the target rate of 2.0% from 2015 onwards. The OBR, just like the Bank of England, have been surprised by the larger-than-expected upward effect of tuition fees and domestic energy price increases.

As an aside, the median of the independent forecasts suggest that the Bank of England’s asset purchase facility (the mechanism for what has become known as Quantitative Easing) will be extended from the current level of £375 billion to £425 billion in 2013. Next year, oil prices (Brent crude) are expected to vary around a median of $110 per barrel with the highest forecast around $122 and the lowest at $85.

3. Employment
The employment situation is characterised by relative strength, given such poor rates of economic growth. The OBR’s revised forecast shows a 0.7% decrease (from 8.7% to 8.0%) for 2012 since the March issue of the Economic and Fiscal Outlook.
4. Government Debt
The OBR are forecasting Public Sector Net Borrowing[1] (PSNB) to come in at around 5.1% of GDP by March 2013. Exclude the transfer of Royal Mail pension assets to the public sector and this rises to 6.9% of GDP. Public debt[2] is expected to continue to rise toward a peak of 80% of GDP in early 2016.
5. Summary
Economic output remains substantially below the level it reached early in 2008. The latest central forecast projections from the OBR suggest that the British economy will not recover the ground it has lost until the final quarter of 2014. If the OBR is correct in its assessment, relatively low growth in the years ahead will be accompanied by sustained low rates of inflation (though CPI will remain above target in the short term) and a steadily improving employment situation. Total government debt will peak in 2016 at a level close to 80% of GDP with net borrowing at its highest in 2014 at something like £100 billion.
No individual financial advice is provided during the course of this Blog.

I hope you have found this information of interest.
Happy New Year to all our Blog readers. I hope 2013 is a prosperous year for us all. 

Keith G Churchouse FPFS
Director, Chapters Financial Limited 

Chapters Financial Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority, number 402899.



[1] Public Sector Net Borrowing: A measure of the amount of money the Government has had to borrow in order to bridge the gap between expenditure and revenue.
[2] Public Sector Net Debt: A measure of how much the UK public sector owes (to UK private sector organisations or overseas institutions) at a point in time.

Monday, 10 December 2012

Saving across the generations/ Children's pensions

George Osborne's Autumn Statement at the beginning of December 2012 bought into sharp focus the way pension contributions have be made, the falling limits of future contribution levels and also the maximum levels of pension 'pots' that can be accrued before penal tax charges would be applied.

This last point noted refers to the pension 'Lifetime Allowance' (or LTA for short) currently standing at £1.5m of total pension value (already fallen from £1.8m), to a new proposed level of £1.25m in the tax year 2014/2015. As an example, benefits that are crystallised in this tax year at a greater value than £1.5m (without existing protection arrangements) could see the balance taxed at a level of up to 55%.

Based on recent economic times, many people in their middle years only dream of having a total pension pot value of £1.5 or £1.25m at retirement. And it is this point that I have received the most client comment, referring to their own situations of probably 'only' achieving a total pension value of 'say' half this LTA value, and then promptly referring to their children who they fear may not even get close to half their parents half.

This has prompted me to remind various clients that they can start pensions for their children at very young ages and put money away into this for their futures. The contribution would normally be limited to a maximum gross contribution of £3,600 in a tax year, with basic rate tax relief bringing this down to a net contribution of £2,880 for the year. Conveniently, this net amount could also fall outside the donor’s estate for inheritance tax purposes as a gift using the annual gift allowance of (currently) £3,000 per annum.

The pension contributions made for the child and the tax relief, which the insurer will reclaim from the Revenue, are invested in a fund which grows in a tax efficient manner.

It is important that you are aware that the value of the pension as well as any income which they generate can fall as well as rise and that past performance is not a guarantee of the future. If you surrender the contract, especially during the early years, you may get back less than you have invested.

In my opinion, the main factor is not the contribution level, but the duration of time for investment that may have the biggest impact. With the minimum age that pension benefits can be drawn now increased to age 55, a child aged 10 has at least 45 years (currently) before they could draw pension benefits. It is this accumulation time that is likely to see significant value being accrued for a child's future use and benefit.

No individual advice has been provided in the content of this blog, and if you would like to consider this opportunity, then please let us know at our office in Guildford. As you can see, saving in a tax efficient way across the generations is something many parents are considering, fuelled by their concerns for their offspring’s financial futures.

Keith Churchouse FPFS
Director
Chartered Financial Planner
ISO 22222 Certified Financial Planner
Chapters Financial Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority, number 402899.

Thursday, 6 December 2012

The Autumn Statement 2012

It was a busy day at Westminster on Wednesday 05th December with the numerous announcements and changes to the many rules and regulations that maintain the UK Governments fiscal policy. As the saying goes 'the devil is in the detail' of these Budget changes, with additional tax and allowances being taken on one hand and given back or withdrawn (such as the planned 3p (approximate) fuel tax rise in January 2013) on the other.

From a financial planning perspective, there are some headlines that will be of interest (with some benefits and concerns) to our clients and enquirers and I have listed some of these changes below. This is not an exhaustive list, but provides many relevant points that you may want to consider:

Capital Gains Tax (CGT) Increase

The current allowance of £10,600 (2012/2013) will increase by 1% the tax year start 2014, rising to £11,100 by tax year 2015/2016.

ISA Allowance Increase

The current allowance of £11,280 will increase by 1% to £11,520 from the tax year start 2013.

Pension Annual Allowance Reduction

The maximum annual pension contribution in a pension input period (PIP) will fall from £50,000 (from all sources) to £40,000 from tax year start 2014/2015.

This is likely to have significant effect on higher earners and those with members of final salary pension schemes with higher annual incomes.

Pension Lifetime Allowance Limit Reduction

The current Lifetime Allowance Limit (LTA) is falling from its current limit of £1.50m to £1.25m from the start of the tax year 2014/2015.

This is likely to haves significant effect on higher earners who have long service within a final salary arrangement or large private pension arrangements. A point of note is that a transitional 'fixed protection' regime will be introduced for those who understand that they may be affected by the reduction in the lifetime allowance (LTA).

Pension Income Drawdown Maximum Withdrawal Limit

Originally the maximum ‘drawdown’ limit was 120% of the Government Actuarial Departments (GAD) limit that could be approximately achieved through averaged single life annuity rates. This fell to 100% about 18 months ago, sadly at a time when annuity rates were continuing to fall.

As soon as legislation will allow, the original limit of 120% is being restored, which will be of interest to those who have seen their maximum withdrawals fall significantly in recent times.

Income Tax Personal Allowance Increase

The Personal Allowance for the tax year 2013-14 will increase to £9,440 and the basic rate limit will be set at £32,010.

The increase in the higher rate threshold will be capped at 1% for tax years 2014-15 and 2015-16.

Inheritance Tax Nil Rate Band Allowance Increase

The current Inheritance Tax nil rate band allowance for an individual of £325,000 will increase to £329,000 from tax year start 2015/2016.

Summary

These are only examples of some of the changes that may be of interest to you when considering your financial planning for the future. Because of the scope of the changes and because each client is advised individually, no individual advice is provided in the content of this Blog.

More details of the Autumn Statement changes can be found at the HMRC website here:
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget-updates/march2012/autumn-statement-dec2012.htm

Chapters Financial Limited is not responsible for the content of external webpages.

If you would like to consider your own financial planning further then please contact Chapters Financial Limited through our website or on 01483 578800.

Keith G Churchouse FPFS
Director
ISO22222 Certified Financial Planner, Chartered Financial Planner Chapters Financial Limited

Chapters Financial Limited is Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, number 402899.